On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:01:11 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>
> One of the major issues they had was how to license their code such that
> they can continue selling commercialized versions (with proprietary 3rd
> party modules like Pango),

Is there a typo in there somewhere? Pango is certainly free software,
and not proprietary.

-Carl

Attachment: pgpiaDcQyLlxl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Desktop_architects mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects

Reply via email to