I think it's worth to point out some of issues in this thread:

1. Google, GoogleEarth
Why hasn't anyone asked Google why they don't distribute a Linux version
of GoogleEarth and others of their applications? Since Google likes to
be known as the top OpenSource sponsor this should have happened a long
time ago? So Google might have some very good answers.

2. Quoting:
"One of the biggest desktop Linux inconveniences is the lack of support
for existing proprietary applications from big vendors such as Adobe,
Autodesk and Intuit"

Inconvenience?! This is not an inconvenience - it is a deal-killer! I
have been waiting to run a Linux desktop since I installed Red Hat 5.1
and I am no closer to my goal. I am an open-minded consulting engineer,
but the lack of support from Adobe and AutoDesk absolutely makes Linux
on MY desktop a non-starter.

This is exactly what was meant with the first "top inhibitor of the
Linux desktop adoption" in the OSDL survey. And "... makes Linux on MY
desktop a non-starter" means this is the single most important issue the
Linux desktop faces. Until you don't realize this there won't be any
hope for the success of the Linux desktop.

Also, there are simply not enough good desktop productivity tools out
there. Many of the best-in-class Linux applications are "almost as good
as their Windows counterparts." That isn't good enough, either.

Sounds as if the poster was quoting me ;-)


3. What is stopping Adobe and Autodesk from porting to Linux
I've talked to senior executives at companies like Adobe and Autodesk
about this question.

My understanding is that lack of market demand is the deal killer,
period.

So we are back to the start again, Linux needs a bigger market share and
for that more applications, etc. It's obvious more applications don't
come from the big guys so the desktop architects should concentrate on
the small ISVs.

  "Jeremy, even if you gave me a CD with a perfect
   version of my software for Linux, I would stick it
   on a shelf.  The current market opportunity doesn't
   justify any of the costs a new platform would demand;
   development is the least of it."

Wine is important as an intermediate step in case of no other solutions
but will never be accepted as the normal way.

4. Answer to "What is stopping ..."
So this reinforces the strategies we came up with at the DAM:  Make it
easy for "little" 3rd party developers to take advantage of the Linux
niche.  The Linux marketshare may be too small for the big players, but
it may be very enticing to isv's that have been squeezed out of
Windows.  For them, Linux may prove to be large enough and worth the
investment as it continues to grow.  Thus our approach at trying to make
it easier for ISVs to port through docs, standards, etc. is a good
approach.

That's exactly I designed wyoGuide for. It might be not what you like
but why not try to improve it so it may fit your purpose as well?

5. What *others* need in order to port to Linux?
Maybe the right question to ask is not what's hindering Autodesk,
etc. but rather what other companies are struggling in their markets and
are desperate for any marketshare at all, and then ask what *they* need
in order to port to Linux?

Why not simply ask the ISVs? Why doesn't OSDL start another survey which
asks all the big and small ISVs what the need to port their applications
to Linux? Okay I'll start a list of questions for such a survey at
"http://wyoguide.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/OSDL_survey_for_ISVs";.
It might be a good idea to get some answers before the next DAM.

6. People using the linux desktop
on the other hand, there are a non-negligible number of people using
the linux
desktop now. apparently they number in the millions if the 1-5%
market share
numbers are to be believed.

You might remember that above 50% of the participants in the survey have
Linux deployed while still requesting none-Linux applications. Since
most of you don't believe my conclusions, it might be a good idea to ask
these users "why" in another survey (see
http://wyoguide.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/OSDL_survey_for_users).

O. Wyss

--
Application guidelines: http://wyoguide.sf.net/


_______________________________________________
Desktop_architects mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects

Reply via email to