Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Wednesday 18 January 2006 11:14, Brooks, Phil wrote: > >>It would be a lot easier to convince Adobe to do a Linux port if they >>thought the could get incremental revenue from animation artists doing >>work on Linux render farms. > > > didn't Disney pay to get WINE running Photoshop? so without doing a port > Adobe > is likely reaching a good % of the market who would purchase a Linux-native > port today, and all the while "photoshop doesn't run on linux". the best of > all worlds when it comes to dissincentivation! ;)
Yes, Disney did, along with the other animation studios. That actually served to get Adobe's attention; it was not at all a disincentive. What *was* a disincentive was that when Adobe went to gauge the market demand for Photoshop on Linux, the result was not compelling. Cheers, Jeremy _______________________________________________ Desktop_architects mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects
