+1 bundling with test apps is annoying and reminded me to file
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1031961 a while ago, anyone
wanna give me a pointer and hopefully I can get round to fixing it, its
mostly the test apps, but seeing as they are reference devices that dont go
through certification, I dont see any reason to not let users delete stuff
they dont want

On 29 September 2014 20:18, Kevin Grandon <[email protected]> wrote:

> Most of these testing apps are not even needed for developers besides when
> we are developing the feature. We should probably do a better job of
> removing old testing apps, or opting into installing them.
>
> They should not be on the base image though as they are not useful for
> development in most cases, and generally hamper the dogfooding experience.
> Also if these are on the base image, then it's likely that we did not
> bundle with an optimized profile, so performance is probably worse as well.
>
> Best,
> Kevin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sebastián Enrique Becerra Cancino" <[email protected]>
> To: "Kevin Grandon" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Asa Dotzler" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 11:01:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [b2g] Please update your Flame to the new base image
>
> But Kevin, Flame devices are not intended for end users, actually as a
> base image should have the engineer apps and then update to 2.0 with
> non-engineer apps.--
> Atte.
>
> Sebastián Enrique Becerra Cancino
> Facebook: SebaEBC
> Twitter: @SebaEBC
> Tel.: +56 9 9169 0521
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Kevin Grandon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > The main issues I have noticed with the v180 base image are pretty bad.
> > 1 - No fonts when we had previous base images which had fonts bundled.
> > 2 - Engineering apps are installed by default - this is not ideal for
> end users because a lot of them can not be removed.
> > I think that these are P1 issues, and the v180 image is not ready for
> release. Can we take the v180 base image down until we have something half
> way decent to offer users?
> > How did this happen in the first place and how can we make sure it
> doesn't happen again? Does QA do a quality sign-off on these images?
> > Best,
> > Kevin
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Asa Dotzler" <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 4:37:23 PM
> > Subject: [b2g] Please update your Flame to the new base image
> > The Flame reference phone, which many of you all are using for
> > development, testing, and dogfooding, is transitioning from a Gonk that
> > is based on Android 4.2 JellyBean to one based on 4.4 KitKat.
> > Many of you will likely have flashed the v123 base image (Firefox OS
> > 1.3) and then done a "shallow" flash of contemporary Gecko and Gaia on
> > top of that. Having done that, you are probably receiving nightly
> > updates of the Gecko and Gia layers from Mozilla.
> > Those updates are going to stop real soon now because we're moving our
> > development and testing focus to the KitKat-based Gonk and trying to
> > avoid a long and painful overlap period.
> > Unfortunately, we don't have a simple mechanism for updating you to the
> > new builds so you are going to have to repeat those steps of flashing a
> > new base image and then shallow flashing Gecko and Gia to continue to
> > receive nightly updates.
> > The new base image is v180 and the new Gecko and Gaia bits live in
> > directories on FTP appended with -KK.
> > Tony has updated the QA docs and I've updated the Flame page at MDN* to
> > point to the new v180 base image and the new Mozilla FTP directories.
> > We're in a period of transition that becomes more expensive the longer
> > we're in it, so please take a moment today or tomorrow to move to the
> > new image and updates. The last thing we all need is for QA and
> > Engineering to spend more time chasing down phantom bugs that cannot be
> > reproduced on the latest bits.
> > I recognize that this is not an ideal workflow and we are investigating
> > ways to mitigate these kinds of stop and reset requirements. It's a
> > challenge dealing with a system that includes bits Mozilla cannot host
> > and distribute so we appreciate your patience as we go through the first
> > of these transitions, learn from it, and make improvements for next time.
> > - A
> > *
> >
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox_OS/Developer_phone_guide/Flame#Updating_your_Flame%27s_software
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev-b2g mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev-b2g mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
> _______________________________________________
> dev-b2g mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
>
_______________________________________________
dev-b2g mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g

Reply via email to