L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote:
> Has there been any additional effort to deal with tests that have
> been disabled under e10s?  This change means we've essentially
> turned off a decent number of tests.

IIRC, the last time we talked about this, there was interest in either running
tests explicitly disabled in e10s in a non-e10s browser or doing another
e10s-style run-through and sign-off of the remaining tests to move them to
suites that won't be turned off or to verify that we don't lose test coverage
of things we care about. Felipe was going to use the scripts that we used in
the original e10s rollout to generate a new list of tests to verify.
Blake Kaplan
dev-platform mailing list

Reply via email to