Your behavior let me think of a Chinese word "株连九族", means "to implicate the 
nine generations of a family", this is an extreme penalty in feudal times in 
China that if a man committed a crime, the whole clan that up to nine 
generation was implicated, all must be killed together.  
Please refer to Bing dictionary: 
http://cn.bing.com/dict/search?q=%E6%A0%AA%E8%BF%9E%E4%B9%9D%E6%97%8F&qs=n&form=Z9LH5&pq=%E6%A0%AA%E8%BF%9E%E4%B9%9D%E6%97%8F&sc=1-4&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=0E897ABC8DD04BE09B182CB4EB71ED6A

This case is WoSign problem, you found out all related subordinate companies 
and all related parent companies that up to nine generations! I think this is 
NOT the best practice in the modern law-respect society.

To answer your question, I am sorry I don't know who is my shareholder's 
shareholder's shareholders, this is out of my job.  


Regards,

Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Bowen [mailto:pzbo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 10:31 PM
To: Richard Wang <rich...@wosign.com>
Cc: Gervase Markham <g...@mozilla.org>; 
mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Incidents involving the CA WoSign

Richard,

I'm still somewhat confused.  Can you review the following statements and 
either confirm they are true or specify they are not true and correct them?
I hope these are reasonably easy to confirm or for you to correct if they are 
not true.

Thanks,
Peter

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Richard Wang <rich...@wosign.com> wrote:
> Hi Gerv,
>
> For Issue R listed in Wiki, we released the news today: 
> https://www.wosign.com/english/News/WoSign_completed_equity_investment
> _to_StartCom_CA.htm
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Richard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev-security-policy 
> [mailto:dev-security-policy-bounces+richard=wosign.com@lists.mozilla.o
> rg] On Behalf Of Richard Wang
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 6:05 PM
> To: Gervase Markham <g...@mozilla.org>
> Cc: mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
> Subject: RE: Incidents involving the CA WoSign
>
> Hi Gerv,
>
> This is the final report: 
> https://www.wosign.com/report/WoSign_Incident_Final_Report_09162016.pd
> f
>
> Please let me if you have any questions about the report, thanks.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Richard Wang
> CEO
> WoSign CA Limited
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gervase Markham
> Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 7:00 PM
> To: Richard Wang; mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
> Subject: Re: Incidents involving the CA WoSign
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 07/09/16 11:06, Richard Wang wrote:
>> This discuss has been lasting two weeks, I think it is time to end 
>> it, it doesn’t worth to waste everybody’s precious time.
>
> Unfortunately, I think we may be only beginning.
>
> I have prepared a list of the issues we are tracking with WoSign's 
> certificate issuance process and business:
>
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:WoSign_Issues
>
> Please can you provide a response to issues F, P, S and T at your earliest 
> convenience?
>
> In addition, if you have further things to say about issues D, H, J, L, N or 
> V we would be happy to hear them.
>
> Thank you for your suggestions, but once Mozilla has a full understanding of 
> what has gone on we will be in a better position to decide what next actions 
> are appropriate.
>
> With best wishes,
>
> Gerv
> _______________________________________________
> dev-security-policy mailing list
> dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
> _______________________________________________
> dev-security-policy mailing list
> dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to