I will wait others to chime in, but Michael have done a very nice job here.. I think this is pretty much ready to be merged...
I will wait the release that I'm doing this week (should be done already.. fixing a few last issues as usual)... but other than that.. I think this has addressed all the issues raised by Dan on the Pull Request.. as Michael. On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Michael André Pearce <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to start a fresh discussion to keep things cleaner, and to > provide more of a notification/update. (also to better name the subject) > > The requirement for such a tool comes from many end users (including myself) > which keep requesting such a feature of a web management console (a small > selection of a much larger list i can supply many more), and so becomes more > and more pressing to resolve. > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-monitor-artemis-td4727071.html > <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-monitor-artemis-td4727071.html> > https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/39052/administration-console-for-artemis-jms-broker > > <https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/39052/administration-console-for-artemis-jms-broker> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37162532/how-to-monitor-apache-artemis > <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37162532/how-to-monitor-apache-artemis> > > > Based off the discussion here: > > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-td4717136i40.html#a4728199 > > <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-td4717136i40.html#a4728199> > > We have some key requirements as noted were (not exhaustive but a small > summary of noted in the above thread): > > Must be ActiveMQ Branded > No third party / propriety other products should be mentioned apart from a > powered by. > Help and about pages should be ActiveMQ Artemis focussed > Provide functionality to manage the broker > This should be able to expand over time > License/Notice files and any legal requirements are updated/met > The war size should be kept to a minimum > Login/Security should be integrated to the broker roles/users > Plugins/customisation specific to AcitveMQ Artemis to reside in ActiveMQ > Artemis project. > > Also we had some good early feedback in the community on the missing bits in > our early PR, of bits that needed/must be addressed. (thanks to Dan, Clebert, > Martyn). > > We believe we have a viable “agreeable" solution to provide a web console > admin for Apache ActiveMQ Artemis. > > As such we don’t see any reason to hold off and would like to bring your > attention (again) to the PR please make any standard review comments there. > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1385 > <https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1385> > > Also there has been a small discussion on how to release this, so that we can > start to get end user feedback, as users tend to want a built usable > distribution, like wise there is concern of bundling this into the next > release. > > We propose: > We will release the upcoming next version of Apache ActiveMQ Artemis, WITHOUT > the new web console. This is due to occur in the coming week. > We will then subsequently look to merge and release another version of Apache > ActiveMQ Artemis WITH the console, so it is in a clean release with only the > addition of the web console. This should occur almost immediately after. > > I should thank Clebert and Martyn in offering to run the extra release this > would require, but de-risk some community concerns. > > This solution is based off a hawtio framework, i would like to iterate i am > not a RedHat employee, nor anything to do with Hawtio project. I work for a > company that uses the project like other end users, and simply see it as a > framework to enable us in activemq to deliver a usable web management console > for artemis with as little cost, effort and maintenance as possible, to > provide an immediate need in the user community. > > Many thanks > Mike -- Clebert Suconic
