Perhaps a bad description of what I meant. To clarify, I didn't see any powered by logo when I was browsing the console. A point that was on the check list and was raised by a community member. When I've seen these types of "powered by" logos before, they've been included in a page footer along with other site information. I'd need to go digging to find it in the about page. I presume the intent of including the powered by logo, is to draw traction to the HawtIO project, imo a reasonable request, but perhaps not fulfilled by having it hidden away.
I don't think it's a blocker for the PR. Just something I wanted to call out. We can discuss further on a JIRA. On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Justin Bertram <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm confused. Did Martyn say that a "Powered By" needs to be on the main > page of the console? > > > Justin > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Michael André Pearce < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > As Dan says there is a reference to being powered by in the about page. > > > > I was under the impression it shouldn't be up front an centre, but in the > > about area would suffice. > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On 27 Jul 2017, at 13:11, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Jul 27, 2017, at 6:56 AM, Martyn Taylor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > > >> No third party / propriety other products should be mentioned apart > > from a > > >> powered by. > > >> * I don't see any powered by on the main screens. We can open a JIRA > > to > > >> track it once this is merged. > > > > > > It shouldn’t be on the main screen…. There is information on the > “About” > > page (at least last time I looked at it) which is enough. > > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> This should be able to expand over time > > >> * Met. It's extendable. > > >> > > >> License/Notice files and any legal requirements are updated/met > > >> * I've been through each source, license and notice file. Both in > this > > >> project and the original project this is imported from. The original > > >> project was not properly licensed, which caused some concern. > However, > > >> I've sent a PR which was merged. I think we're all good here. > > >> > > >> In summary, I think it's a great first start and something users can > use > > >> pretty much straight away. > > >> > > >> +1 from me. Great work Michael. > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> > > >> > > >>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Justin Bertram <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I just reviewed the new console via the PR. I really like it. Nice > > work! > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Justin > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Clebert Suconic < > > >>> [email protected]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> That's fair guys.. I was just tempted to do it.. but won't to it. > > >>>> > > >>>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Michael André Pearce > > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> I would agree, we should stick to the plan. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Merging straight after release and releasing again won't delay in > > >>>> reality the time people can use it. Apart from a few days at most. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> But will address/de risks any concerns. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Sent from my iPhone > > >>>>> > > >>>>>>> On 13 Jul 2017, at 17:23, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On 07/13/2017 12:10 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > >>>>>>> I am tempted to merge it now actually.... > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Anyone opposed to this? it would be cool to have a console on > this > > >>>>>>> next release.. if it's all good. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Please stick to the original plan. I guessing there's other folks > > >>> like > > >>>> myself who haven't had time to even look at this new console yet. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Michael André Pearce > > >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> Hi All, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I would like to start a fresh discussion to keep things cleaner, > > and > > >>>> to provide more of a notification/update. (also to better name the > > >>> subject) > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> The requirement for such a tool comes from many end users > > (including > > >>>> myself) which keep requesting such a feature of a web management > > console > > >>> (a > > >>>> small selection of a much larger list i can supply many more), and > so > > >>>> becomes more and more pressing to resolve. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-monitor- > > >>>> artemis-td4727071.html <http://activemq.2283324.n4. > > >>>> nabble.com/How-to-monitor-artemis-td4727071.html> > > >>>>>>>> https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/ > > >>>> 39052/administration-console-for-artemis-jms-broker < > > >>> https://softwarerecs. > > >>>> stackexchange.com/questions/39052/administration-console- > > >>>> for-artemis-jms-broker> > > >>>>>>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37162532/how-to- > > >>>> monitor-apache-artemis <https://stackoverflow.com/ > > >>>> questions/37162532/how-to-monitor-apache-artemis> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Based off the discussion here: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing- > > >>>> the-Web-Console-td4717136i40.html#a4728199 < > > http://activemq.2283324.n4. > > >>>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-td4717136i40. > > html#a4728199> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> We have some key requirements as noted were (not exhaustive but > a > > >>>> small summary of noted in the above thread): > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Must be ActiveMQ Branded > > >>>>>>>> No third party / propriety other products should be mentioned > > apart > > >>>> from a powered by. > > >>>>>>>> Help and about pages should be ActiveMQ Artemis focussed > > >>>>>>>> Provide functionality to manage the broker > > >>>>>>>> This should be able to expand over time > > >>>>>>>> License/Notice files and any legal requirements are updated/met > > >>>>>>>> The war size should be kept to a minimum > > >>>>>>>> Login/Security should be integrated to the broker roles/users > > >>>>>>>> Plugins/customisation specific to AcitveMQ Artemis to reside in > > >>>> ActiveMQ Artemis project. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Also we had some good early feedback in the community on the > > missing > > >>>> bits in our early PR, of bits that needed/must be addressed. (thanks > > to > > >>>> Dan, Clebert, Martyn). > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> We believe we have a viable “agreeable" solution to provide a > web > > >>>> console admin for Apache ActiveMQ Artemis. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> As such we don’t see any reason to hold off and would like to > > bring > > >>>> your attention (again) to the PR please make any standard review > > comments > > >>>> there. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1385 < > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1385> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Also there has been a small discussion on how to release this, > so > > >>>> that we can start to get end user feedback, as users tend to want a > > built > > >>>> usable distribution, like wise there is concern of bundling this > into > > the > > >>>> next release. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> We propose: > > >>>>>>>> We will release the upcoming next version of Apache ActiveMQ > > >>> Artemis, > > >>>> WITHOUT the new web console. This is due to occur in the coming > week. > > >>>>>>>> We will then subsequently look to merge and release another > > version > > >>>> of Apache ActiveMQ Artemis WITH the console, so it is in a clean > > release > > >>>> with only the addition of the web console. This should occur almost > > >>>> immediately after. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I should thank Clebert and Martyn in offering to run the extra > > >>>> release this would require, but de-risk some community concerns. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> This solution is based off a hawtio framework, i would like to > > >>>> iterate i am not a RedHat employee, nor anything to do with Hawtio > > >>> project. > > >>>> I work for a company that uses the project like other end users, and > > >>> simply > > >>>> see it as a framework to enable us in activemq to deliver a usable > web > > >>>> management console for artemis with as little cost, effort and > > >>> maintenance > > >>>> as possible, to provide an immediate need in the user community. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Many thanks > > >>>>>>>> Mike > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Tim Bish > > >>>>>> twitter: @tabish121 > > >>>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Clebert Suconic > > >>>> > > >>> > > > > > > -- > > > Daniel Kulp > > > [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > > > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > > > > > >
