I would agree, we should stick to the plan. Merging straight after release and releasing again won't delay in reality the time people can use it. Apart from a few days at most.
But will address/de risks any concerns. Sent from my iPhone > On 13 Jul 2017, at 17:23, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 07/13/2017 12:10 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: >> I am tempted to merge it now actually.... >> >> Anyone opposed to this? it would be cool to have a console on this >> next release.. if it's all good. > > Please stick to the original plan. I guessing there's other folks like > myself who haven't had time to even look at this new console yet. > >> >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Michael André Pearce >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I would like to start a fresh discussion to keep things cleaner, and to >>> provide more of a notification/update. (also to better name the subject) >>> >>> The requirement for such a tool comes from many end users (including >>> myself) which keep requesting such a feature of a web management console (a >>> small selection of a much larger list i can supply many more), and so >>> becomes more and more pressing to resolve. >>> >>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-monitor-artemis-td4727071.html >>> <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-monitor-artemis-td4727071.html> >>> https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/39052/administration-console-for-artemis-jms-broker >>> >>> <https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/39052/administration-console-for-artemis-jms-broker> >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37162532/how-to-monitor-apache-artemis >>> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37162532/how-to-monitor-apache-artemis> >>> >>> >>> Based off the discussion here: >>> >>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-td4717136i40.html#a4728199 >>> >>> <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-td4717136i40.html#a4728199> >>> >>> We have some key requirements as noted were (not exhaustive but a small >>> summary of noted in the above thread): >>> >>> Must be ActiveMQ Branded >>> No third party / propriety other products should be mentioned apart from a >>> powered by. >>> Help and about pages should be ActiveMQ Artemis focussed >>> Provide functionality to manage the broker >>> This should be able to expand over time >>> License/Notice files and any legal requirements are updated/met >>> The war size should be kept to a minimum >>> Login/Security should be integrated to the broker roles/users >>> Plugins/customisation specific to AcitveMQ Artemis to reside in ActiveMQ >>> Artemis project. >>> >>> Also we had some good early feedback in the community on the missing bits >>> in our early PR, of bits that needed/must be addressed. (thanks to Dan, >>> Clebert, Martyn). >>> >>> We believe we have a viable “agreeable" solution to provide a web console >>> admin for Apache ActiveMQ Artemis. >>> >>> As such we don’t see any reason to hold off and would like to bring your >>> attention (again) to the PR please make any standard review comments there. >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1385 >>> <https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1385> >>> >>> Also there has been a small discussion on how to release this, so that we >>> can start to get end user feedback, as users tend to want a built usable >>> distribution, like wise there is concern of bundling this into the next >>> release. >>> >>> We propose: >>> We will release the upcoming next version of Apache ActiveMQ Artemis, >>> WITHOUT the new web console. This is due to occur in the coming week. >>> We will then subsequently look to merge and release another version of >>> Apache ActiveMQ Artemis WITH the console, so it is in a clean release with >>> only the addition of the web console. This should occur almost immediately >>> after. >>> >>> I should thank Clebert and Martyn in offering to run the extra release this >>> would require, but de-risk some community concerns. >>> >>> This solution is based off a hawtio framework, i would like to iterate i am >>> not a RedHat employee, nor anything to do with Hawtio project. I work for a >>> company that uses the project like other end users, and simply see it as a >>> framework to enable us in activemq to deliver a usable web management >>> console for artemis with as little cost, effort and maintenance as >>> possible, to provide an immediate need in the user community. >>> >>> Many thanks >>> Mike >> >> > > -- > Tim Bish > twitter: @tabish121 > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ >
