That's fair guys.. I was just tempted to do it.. but won't to it. On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Michael André Pearce <[email protected]> wrote: > I would agree, we should stick to the plan. > > Merging straight after release and releasing again won't delay in reality the > time people can use it. Apart from a few days at most. > > But will address/de risks any concerns. > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 13 Jul 2017, at 17:23, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 07/13/2017 12:10 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: >>> I am tempted to merge it now actually.... >>> >>> Anyone opposed to this? it would be cool to have a console on this >>> next release.. if it's all good. >> >> Please stick to the original plan. I guessing there's other folks like >> myself who haven't had time to even look at this new console yet. >> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Michael André Pearce >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I would like to start a fresh discussion to keep things cleaner, and to >>>> provide more of a notification/update. (also to better name the subject) >>>> >>>> The requirement for such a tool comes from many end users (including >>>> myself) which keep requesting such a feature of a web management console >>>> (a small selection of a much larger list i can supply many more), and so >>>> becomes more and more pressing to resolve. >>>> >>>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-monitor-artemis-td4727071.html >>>> >>>> <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-monitor-artemis-td4727071.html> >>>> https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/39052/administration-console-for-artemis-jms-broker >>>> >>>> <https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/39052/administration-console-for-artemis-jms-broker> >>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37162532/how-to-monitor-apache-artemis >>>> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37162532/how-to-monitor-apache-artemis> >>>> >>>> >>>> Based off the discussion here: >>>> >>>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-td4717136i40.html#a4728199 >>>> >>>> <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-td4717136i40.html#a4728199> >>>> >>>> We have some key requirements as noted were (not exhaustive but a small >>>> summary of noted in the above thread): >>>> >>>> Must be ActiveMQ Branded >>>> No third party / propriety other products should be mentioned apart from a >>>> powered by. >>>> Help and about pages should be ActiveMQ Artemis focussed >>>> Provide functionality to manage the broker >>>> This should be able to expand over time >>>> License/Notice files and any legal requirements are updated/met >>>> The war size should be kept to a minimum >>>> Login/Security should be integrated to the broker roles/users >>>> Plugins/customisation specific to AcitveMQ Artemis to reside in ActiveMQ >>>> Artemis project. >>>> >>>> Also we had some good early feedback in the community on the missing bits >>>> in our early PR, of bits that needed/must be addressed. (thanks to Dan, >>>> Clebert, Martyn). >>>> >>>> We believe we have a viable “agreeable" solution to provide a web console >>>> admin for Apache ActiveMQ Artemis. >>>> >>>> As such we don’t see any reason to hold off and would like to bring your >>>> attention (again) to the PR please make any standard review comments there. >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1385 >>>> <https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1385> >>>> >>>> Also there has been a small discussion on how to release this, so that we >>>> can start to get end user feedback, as users tend to want a built usable >>>> distribution, like wise there is concern of bundling this into the next >>>> release. >>>> >>>> We propose: >>>> We will release the upcoming next version of Apache ActiveMQ Artemis, >>>> WITHOUT the new web console. This is due to occur in the coming week. >>>> We will then subsequently look to merge and release another version of >>>> Apache ActiveMQ Artemis WITH the console, so it is in a clean release with >>>> only the addition of the web console. This should occur almost immediately >>>> after. >>>> >>>> I should thank Clebert and Martyn in offering to run the extra release >>>> this would require, but de-risk some community concerns. >>>> >>>> This solution is based off a hawtio framework, i would like to iterate i >>>> am not a RedHat employee, nor anything to do with Hawtio project. I work >>>> for a company that uses the project like other end users, and simply see >>>> it as a framework to enable us in activemq to deliver a usable web >>>> management console for artemis with as little cost, effort and maintenance >>>> as possible, to provide an immediate need in the user community. >>>> >>>> Many thanks >>>> Mike >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Tim Bish >> twitter: @tabish121 >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ >>
-- Clebert Suconic
