I just reviewed the new console via the PR. I really like it. Nice work!
Justin On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > That's fair guys.. I was just tempted to do it.. but won't to it. > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Michael André Pearce > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would agree, we should stick to the plan. > > > > Merging straight after release and releasing again won't delay in > reality the time people can use it. Apart from a few days at most. > > > > But will address/de risks any concerns. > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On 13 Jul 2017, at 17:23, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> On 07/13/2017 12:10 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > >>> I am tempted to merge it now actually.... > >>> > >>> Anyone opposed to this? it would be cool to have a console on this > >>> next release.. if it's all good. > >> > >> Please stick to the original plan. I guessing there's other folks like > myself who haven't had time to even look at this new console yet. > >> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Michael André Pearce > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Hi All, > >>>> > >>>> I would like to start a fresh discussion to keep things cleaner, and > to provide more of a notification/update. (also to better name the subject) > >>>> > >>>> The requirement for such a tool comes from many end users (including > myself) which keep requesting such a feature of a web management console (a > small selection of a much larger list i can supply many more), and so > becomes more and more pressing to resolve. > >>>> > >>>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/How-to-monitor- > artemis-td4727071.html <http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/How-to-monitor-artemis-td4727071.html> > >>>> https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/ > 39052/administration-console-for-artemis-jms-broker <https://softwarerecs. > stackexchange.com/questions/39052/administration-console- > for-artemis-jms-broker> > >>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37162532/how-to- > monitor-apache-artemis <https://stackoverflow.com/ > questions/37162532/how-to-monitor-apache-artemis> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Based off the discussion here: > >>>> > >>>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing- > the-Web-Console-td4717136i40.html#a4728199 <http://activemq.2283324.n4. > nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-td4717136i40.html#a4728199> > >>>> > >>>> We have some key requirements as noted were (not exhaustive but a > small summary of noted in the above thread): > >>>> > >>>> Must be ActiveMQ Branded > >>>> No third party / propriety other products should be mentioned apart > from a powered by. > >>>> Help and about pages should be ActiveMQ Artemis focussed > >>>> Provide functionality to manage the broker > >>>> This should be able to expand over time > >>>> License/Notice files and any legal requirements are updated/met > >>>> The war size should be kept to a minimum > >>>> Login/Security should be integrated to the broker roles/users > >>>> Plugins/customisation specific to AcitveMQ Artemis to reside in > ActiveMQ Artemis project. > >>>> > >>>> Also we had some good early feedback in the community on the missing > bits in our early PR, of bits that needed/must be addressed. (thanks to > Dan, Clebert, Martyn). > >>>> > >>>> We believe we have a viable “agreeable" solution to provide a web > console admin for Apache ActiveMQ Artemis. > >>>> > >>>> As such we don’t see any reason to hold off and would like to bring > your attention (again) to the PR please make any standard review comments > there. > >>>> > >>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1385 < > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1385> > >>>> > >>>> Also there has been a small discussion on how to release this, so > that we can start to get end user feedback, as users tend to want a built > usable distribution, like wise there is concern of bundling this into the > next release. > >>>> > >>>> We propose: > >>>> We will release the upcoming next version of Apache ActiveMQ Artemis, > WITHOUT the new web console. This is due to occur in the coming week. > >>>> We will then subsequently look to merge and release another version > of Apache ActiveMQ Artemis WITH the console, so it is in a clean release > with only the addition of the web console. This should occur almost > immediately after. > >>>> > >>>> I should thank Clebert and Martyn in offering to run the extra > release this would require, but de-risk some community concerns. > >>>> > >>>> This solution is based off a hawtio framework, i would like to > iterate i am not a RedHat employee, nor anything to do with Hawtio project. > I work for a company that uses the project like other end users, and simply > see it as a framework to enable us in activemq to deliver a usable web > management console for artemis with as little cost, effort and maintenance > as possible, to provide an immediate need in the user community. > >>>> > >>>> Many thanks > >>>> Mike > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Tim Bish > >> twitter: @tabish121 > >> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > >> > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic >
