Thanks. Will fix it to morrow as I’m out of work today.
Would be too much of an overkill to write a java class to generate the website download automagically? so it won’t have these mistakes in future. (Or at least we can fix it once for all) On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 5:19 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > The entry added on the past-releases page for 2.6.2 has the same > issues as discussed before, with the content being based on the main > download page again rather than the other entries on the past-releases > page. > > The download links point at the main dist area rather than the > archive. They currently still work, but only until 2.6.2 (along with > 2.6.1) is cleared from the mirrors now that 2.6.3 is there, at which > point they will be broken. > > The docs link points to the docs for the current release, and though > thats ok currently its likely to be an issue in future. > > Robbie > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 21:42, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > As Tim says it is still broken, I didn't change anything since my mail > earlier. > > > > On 12 July 2018 at 21:29, Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 07/12/2018 04:08 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > >> > > >> @Robbie thanks for fixing it.. just came into it and realized you > > >> already did it.. thanks > > > > > > > > > Documentation link for 2.6.1 on this page is still broken for me: > > > http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/past-releases.html > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Robbie Gemmell > > >> <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> The 2.6.1 docs link at > > >>> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/past-releases.html is broken. The > > >>> link itself seems fine this time and the other 2.6.1 links work, > there > > >>> just dont seem to be any 2.6.1 docs. > > >>> > > >>> The 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 releases aren't mentioned on > > >>> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/previous-docs.html > > >>> > > >>> Robbie > > >>> > > >>> On 20 June 2018 at 13:20, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> As I said some links just weren't updated to reflect the newer > > >>>> checksum distribution policy, but most were broken from pointing at > > >>>> the wrong download area/server and using the query arguments that > > >>>> aren't used there. That suggested the content was copied unchanged > > >>>> from download.html into past-releases.html, which it generally > > >>>> shouldnt be. > > >>>> > > >>>> This commit > > >>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5e07407b600aaae38a7ed757a0008bc70cca7a712868812202189f28@%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E > > >>>> shows a couple of issues: > > >>>> - All of the links for 2.5.0 and 2.6.0 were broken except for the > > >>>> release notes and commit report links. The main links pointed to the > > >>>> wrong download server/area, with the tar/zip links also having query > > >>>> args left from the mirror system. The doc links pointed to the > central > > >>>> docs page rather than the actual docs for the release. > > >>>> - The 1.5.6 release entry had links pointing to .sha1 files that > dont > > >>>> exist. Those were presumably just missed in updating the links from > > >>>> 1.5.5, which did have .sha1 checksums. I updated those to link to > the > > >>>> .sha512 files from the current distribution policy. > > >>>> > > >>>> The typo you mention below was trivial so I didnt call it out in the > > >>>> mail but adjusted that in this commit: > > >>>> > > >>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3d6c90c59e30d65013a0f5bc7243434edb8eb817ffd2272b3be341de@%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E > > >>>> > > >>>> A final change is mostly just reducing indent, as I removed the > > >>>> wrapper divs (presumably also copied from download.html) for the > > >>>> latest entries since the earlier ones dont have those and they all > > >>>> live within an outer wrapper div already: > > >>>> > > >>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/641671780a10b81419711805519e7a8643688be53705c844ab7520de@%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E > > >>>> > > >>>> On 19 June 2018 at 15:59, Clebert Suconic < > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I will be more careful... although.. beyond a typo on the > > >>>>> description.. of 2.6.0 in one of the downloads.. I had something > like > > >>>>> <a href = "....2.6.0..."> 2.5.0 </a> what was the actual mistake. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I'm a bit rusty in svn.. and even though I could find the diff.. I > did > > >>>>> not understand what was my actual mistake. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Robbie Gemmell > > >>>>> <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I tried downloading some Artemis bits using links from the website > > >>>>>> earlier and found various links not working. Some just weren't > updated > > >>>>>> to reflect the newer checksum distribution policy, but most were > > >>>>>> broken from pointing at the wrong download area/server and using > the > > >>>>>> query arguments that no longer apply. I've fixed the ones I saw > now, > > >>>>>> but as I had also done the same for earlier releases previously I > > >>>>>> think its now worth noting the issue here to hopefully avoid > future > > >>>>>> breakages occurring. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> It looks like the content is being copied unchanged from the main > > >>>>>> download page to the past releases page. This wont work because > the > > >>>>>> main page links to the download mirrors and that content is > removed > > >>>>>> for historic releases as newer ones occur, so any links for past > > >>>>>> releases must reference the archive. The mirrored download links > also > > >>>>>> use query arguments that don't apply for the archive area. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Instead, I think the simplest thing to do is to copy the prior > release > > >>>>>> entry on the past releases page and update the version numbers > with > > >>>>>> basic find/replace. I went to update the RELEASING.md file to > suggest > > >>>>>> this but found it already says that, so thought I'd send a mail to > > >>>>>> highlight the issue instead. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Robbie > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Clebert Suconic > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > Tim Bish > > > twitter: @tabish121 > > > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > > > > -- Clebert Suconic
