I was originally going to begin the rename process for Qpid tomorrow, but in the past week I have either done or been on the receiving end of some GitHub-based renames elsewhere which gave a nicer end result than pushing a new branch and updating the default would.
Knowing that it is an option to push to the Apache GitHub repos I had a chat with Infra about whether it might actually be possible for them to use the GitHub renaming tooling for this, as its just a nicer end state for everyone. Infra said it isnt something they have done before but would look into it, and could possibly try it out on the Qpid repos. You might want to hold off on the ActiveMQ repo changes a little to see what the outcome of that is. On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 15:34, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks a lot, I have everything I need now > > I plan to work on this next week.. I will follow up with progress as I > go over this thread. > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 6:24 AM Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Yep, thats the only config we have for the website auto build, which > > is a standard build. Essentially we just enable it and tell it which > > branch to build changes from (the one matching whoami) and then the > > target branch to commit and push any output updates to, where they are > > then picked up from for the web servers. > > > > The build itself occurs on a Builtbot CI instance at > > https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders/7. A mail is sent on each build to > > commits@, e.g the latest one is: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc14442fcfba8395bec5207f2c43b8dbde068f369fabe50de039509fc%40%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3E > > > > On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 22:46, Justin Bertram <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > The website actually uses Jekyll. The branch it uses is controlled via the > > > .asf.yaml file [1]. More details about this are here [2]. > > > > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/blob/master/.asf.yaml > > > [2] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-JekyllCMS > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:42 PM Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I see the website is the pelican system. > > > > > > > > I'm not sure how the AMQ5 is configured on Jenkins... that's the only > > > > thing > > > > I'm lost now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:31 PM Clebert Suconic > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > That's right.. I will do it for all the Branches... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At this point now I'm looking to what I would need to change on > > > > > ci-builds > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm looking on ci-builds for things we would need to change.. > > > > > > > > > > however I don't understand how ActiveMQ5 is configured here: > > > > > > > > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I could find the simple configuration on artemis, but AMQ5 is using > > > > > some fancy configuration that I don't know where it's taking it from. > > > > > > > > > > @Jb or anyone can you give me some pointers here? I'm really curious > > > > > now.. (I know you could say you would change it. .but at this point > > > > > I'm trying to understand what is going on :) ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also: where is the build for the website? I can't find it on > > > > > ci-builds.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > That’s my guess as well ;) > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 9 mars 2021 à 08:57, michael.andre.pearce < > > > > > [email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I assume the plan is to cover all repos, not just artemis.Sent > > > > > > > from > > > > my > > > > > Galaxy > > > > > > > -------- Original message --------From: Clebert Suconic < > > > > > [email protected]> Date: 06/03/2021 14:33 (GMT+00:00) To: > > > > > [email protected] Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Renaming master as main > > > > We > > > > > will have to create the main branch on gitbox and Infra will make > > > > theswitch > > > > > on GitHub.On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 12:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre < > > > > > [email protected]>wrote:> Correct, we should focus on gitbox (that’s > > > > > why > > > > > better to ask to infra).>> Regards> JB>> > Le 5 mars 2021 à 23:16, > > > > > Justin > > > > > Bertram <[email protected]> a écrit :> >> > Aren't the Apache GitHub > > > > > repos just mirrors of the official versions on> > Apache's > > > > infrastructure? > > > > > I know when we merge PRs we push to> > https://gitbox.apache.org/. If > > > > the > > > > > GitHub repo is just a mirror> wouldn't we> > have to rename the > > > > > branch on > > > > > Apache first? I'm not real clear on all the> > details of how the > > > > > integration works so maybe that's wrong.> >> >> > Justin> >> > On Fri, > > > > Mar > > > > > 5, 2021 at 4:06 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]>> wrote:> >> >> > > > > > GitHub solved the PR move if the rename is done via their UI:> >>> >> > > > > > https://github.com/github/renaming > > > > > <https://github.com/github/renaming>> > > > > > >>> >> -Matt> >>> >>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 2:54 PM, Clebert Suconic < > > > > > [email protected]> >> >> wrote:> >>>> >>> Good point.> >>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > I’m not sure what to do with pending PRs> >>>> >>> In artemis you > > > > > could > > > > use > > > > > the scripts and they would work.> >>>> >>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at > > > > > 2:54 PM > > > > > Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]>> >> wrote:> >>>> >>>> +1 no > > > > > problem. > > > > > Please to cover the CI jobs, so we don’t lose those.> >>>> Thanks!> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> On Mar 5, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Clebert Suconic <> >> > > > > > [email protected]>> >>>> wrote:> >>>>>> >>>>> I would like to > > > > > propose to rename all of our git branches as main on> >>>>> all of our > > > > > branches. This would be a very first easy step to take on> >>>>> > > > > > renaming > > > > > offensive language from our codebases.> >>>>>> >>>>> We could allow > > > > > some > > > > > time before we do that, say 7 days after we> decide> >>>>> to take the > > > > > move.> >>>>>> >>>>> Anyone sees a problem with that?> >>>>>> >>>>> if > > > > > anyone has internal forks depending on master (say if you have a> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > downstream branch of ActiveMQ), you will likely have to update your> > > > > >>>>> > > > > > internal git repos and scripts.> >>>>>> >>>>> We could keep the master > > > > for > > > > > some time without being updated, until> we> >>>>> remove it later.> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> --> >>> Clebert Suconic> >>> >>>> --Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic
