+1  `DeadlineReference`

Regards
Pavan Kumar

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025, 04:11 Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Late to the party, but I'd vote for `DeadlineReference` too. Concise and
> does the job well.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 7:56 AM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > A bit late to the party, but DeadlineReference +1.
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > > On Feb 25, 2025, at 4:02 AM, Daniel Standish
> > <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > Stewing presently thank you :)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 11:53 AM Ferruzzi, Dennis
> > > <ferru...@amazon.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Alright then.  DeadlineReference gets the green light for now!   If
> > anyone
> > >> has a suggestion they like more, please feel free to drop it in here.
> > I'm
> > >> working on some Ariflow3.0 stuff before I get back to this, so there's
> > >> plenty of time before this is set down if anyone wants to stew on it a
> > bit.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for the thoughts, all!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> - ferruzzi
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ________________________________
> > >> From: Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> > >> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 11:11 AM
> > >> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > >> Subject: RE: [EXT] Two Hard Things: Deadline Alerts Edition
> > >>
> > >> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> not
> > >> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> > know
> > >> the content is safe.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur
> > externe.
> > >> Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne
> > pouvez
> > >> pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain
> > que
> > >> le contenu ne présente aucun risque.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Yep. DaeadlineReference is good .
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 8:07 PM Mehta, Shubham
> > <shu...@amazon.com.invalid>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 to DeadlineReference. It is clear and allows flexibility to choose
> > any
> > >>> reference point.
> > >>>
> > >>> shubham
> > >>>
> > >>> On 2025-02-24, 10:00 AM, "Ferruzzi, Dennis"
> <ferru...@amazon.com.inva
> > >>> <mailto:ferru...@amazon.com.inva>LID> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> not
> > >>> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> > >> know
> > >>> the content is safe.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur
> > externe.
> > >>> Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne
> > >> pouvez
> > >>> pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas
> certain
> > >> que
> > >>> le contenu ne présente aucun risque.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Hey folks. I need to narrow down the name for one of the parameters
> on
> > >> the
> > >>> Deadline Alerts work and I'm fishing for suggestions.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> TLDR: need_by_date = {some existing timestamp} + {a user-defined
> > >> timedelta}
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> The existing timestamp could be dynamic (like when the dagrun is
> queued
> > >> or
> > >>> when a specific task stars, etc), or fixed datetime.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> So in practice this will look something like:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> need_by = DeadlineTrigger.DAGRUN_QUEUED + timedelta(hours=1)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> where the DeadlineTrigger is the part we are trying to rename.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> I initially used Anchor in the AIP for lack of a better name and it
> was
> > >>> universally hated. I like Trigger better, but that name is already
> > >>> overloaded in Airflow so I don't want to reuse it. Maybe Reference?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> need_by = DeadlineReference.DAGRUN_STARTED + timedelta(minutes=30?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Please throw some other suggestions or naming thoughts on the pile
> and
> > >>> maybe we can come up with something good.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> - ferruzzi
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to