s/not blocking/*now* blocking On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 1:24 PM Constance Martineau <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's fair. To me, it seemed like we'd reached implicit consensus since > the docs were already standardized on "Dag" and that PR was merged. > > I'm happy to reframe this as a clear vote between "dag", "Dag" or "DAG". > What matters most is that we finally land on one and make it consistent > going forward. > > This has been open long enough that it's not blocking external > contributors and documentation alignment with external stakeholders, so I'd > really like to us to close the loop on this this week. > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 12:47 PM Josef Šimánek <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I prefer DAG, since it is what is actually imported. >> >> from airflow.sdk import DAG >> >> my_dag = DAG( >> dag_id="my_dag_name", >> start_date=datetime.datetime(2021, 1, 1), >> schedule="@daily", >> ) >> EmptyOperator(task_id="task", dag=my_dag) >> >> on the other side, there is also dag decorator >> >> from airflow.sdk import dag >> >> @dag(start_date=datetime.datetime(2021, 1, 1), schedule="@daily") >> def generate_dag(): >> EmptyOperator(task_id="task") >> >> It will be nice to pick the preferred way and keep the terminology 1:1. >> >> út 14. 10. 2025 v 21:11 odesílatel Constance Martineau via dev >> <[email protected]> napsal: >> > >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > Just to wrap up the dag vs DAG vs Dag nomenclature discussions we've >> been >> > having over the last few months, I would like to formally call a vote to >> > standardize on "Dag". >> > >> > Jens already updated the docs for 3.1 via this PR >> > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/55097>, so hopefully this is >> just a >> > formality. >> > >> > Discussion threads: >> > >> > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/lktrzqkzrpvc1cyctxz7zxfmc0fwtq2j >> > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/5fn1n188f99jspt627qhqsp2pznq545s >> > >> > >> > Thank you to everyone who took part in the conversations. The vote will >> run >> > for ~3 days, and last till Friday October 17, 2025 at 7:30pm (countdown >> link >> > <https://countingdownto.com/?c=6644364>). >> > >> > Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and >> Committer's >> > votes are considered binding. >> > >> > Please consider this my +1 (non-binding). >> > -- >> > >> > Constance >> >
