I do not recall a formal consensus either. Correct me if I am wrong, but we are trying to call a vote to standardise on usage of "Dag" in docs? Does that mean we cannot use "dag"?
Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 4:57 AM Daniel Standish via dev < [email protected]> wrote: > I don’t recall there really being consensus on this. > > I would still like to be able to use simply “dag” in a sentence. > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 12:13 PM Constance Martineau via dev < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Just to wrap up the dag vs DAG vs Dag nomenclature discussions we've been > > having over the last few months, I would like to formally call a vote to > > standardize on "Dag". > > > > Jens already updated the docs for 3.1 via this PR > > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/55097>, so hopefully this is > just > > a > > formality. > > > > Discussion threads: > > > > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/lktrzqkzrpvc1cyctxz7zxfmc0fwtq2j > > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/5fn1n188f99jspt627qhqsp2pznq545s > > > > > > Thank you to everyone who took part in the conversations. The vote will > run > > for ~3 days, and last till Friday October 17, 2025 at 7:30pm (countdown > > link > > <https://countingdownto.com/?c=6644364>). > > > > Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and Committer's > > votes are considered binding. > > > > Please consider this my +1 (non-binding). > > -- > > > > Constance > > >
