Other than not using DAG, I don’t recall a consensus either > but we are trying to call a vote to standardise on usage of "Dag" in docs? > Does that mean we cannot use "dag”?
I think that what we should do is if that’s the result. Best, Wei > On Oct 15, 2025, at 2:14 PM, Amogh Desai <[email protected]> wrote: > > I do not recall a formal consensus either. > > Correct me if I am wrong, but we are trying to call a vote to standardise on > usage of "Dag" in docs? Does that mean we cannot use "dag"? > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 4:57 AM Daniel Standish via dev < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I don’t recall there really being consensus on this. >> >> I would still like to be able to use simply “dag” in a sentence. >> >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 12:13 PM Constance Martineau via dev < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> Just to wrap up the dag vs DAG vs Dag nomenclature discussions we've been >>> having over the last few months, I would like to formally call a vote to >>> standardize on "Dag". >>> >>> Jens already updated the docs for 3.1 via this PR >>> <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/55097>, so hopefully this is >> just >>> a >>> formality. >>> >>> Discussion threads: >>> >>> - https://lists.apache.org/thread/lktrzqkzrpvc1cyctxz7zxfmc0fwtq2j >>> - https://lists.apache.org/thread/5fn1n188f99jspt627qhqsp2pznq545s >>> >>> >>> Thank you to everyone who took part in the conversations. The vote will >> run >>> for ~3 days, and last till Friday October 17, 2025 at 7:30pm (countdown >>> link >>> <https://countingdownto.com/?c=6644364>). >>> >>> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and Committer's >>> votes are considered binding. >>> >>> Please consider this my +1 (non-binding). >>> -- >>> >>> Constance >>> >>
