That's fair. To me, it seemed like we'd reached implicit consensus since the docs were already standardized on "Dag" and that PR was merged.
I'm happy to reframe this as a clear vote between "dag", "Dag" or "DAG". What matters most is that we finally land on one and make it consistent going forward. This has been open long enough that it's not blocking external contributors and documentation alignment with external stakeholders, so I'd really like to us to close the loop on this this week. On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 12:47 PM Josef Šimánek <[email protected]> wrote: > I prefer DAG, since it is what is actually imported. > > from airflow.sdk import DAG > > my_dag = DAG( > dag_id="my_dag_name", > start_date=datetime.datetime(2021, 1, 1), > schedule="@daily", > ) > EmptyOperator(task_id="task", dag=my_dag) > > on the other side, there is also dag decorator > > from airflow.sdk import dag > > @dag(start_date=datetime.datetime(2021, 1, 1), schedule="@daily") > def generate_dag(): > EmptyOperator(task_id="task") > > It will be nice to pick the preferred way and keep the terminology 1:1. > > út 14. 10. 2025 v 21:11 odesílatel Constance Martineau via dev > <[email protected]> napsal: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Just to wrap up the dag vs DAG vs Dag nomenclature discussions we've been > > having over the last few months, I would like to formally call a vote to > > standardize on "Dag". > > > > Jens already updated the docs for 3.1 via this PR > > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/55097>, so hopefully this is > just a > > formality. > > > > Discussion threads: > > > > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/lktrzqkzrpvc1cyctxz7zxfmc0fwtq2j > > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/5fn1n188f99jspt627qhqsp2pznq545s > > > > > > Thank you to everyone who took part in the conversations. The vote will > run > > for ~3 days, and last till Friday October 17, 2025 at 7:30pm (countdown > link > > <https://countingdownto.com/?c=6644364>). > > > > Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and Committer's > > votes are considered binding. > > > > Please consider this my +1 (non-binding). > > -- > > > > Constance >
