Yes the award should be one time award per person for the same Rookie award. Else, the same person can win multiple times - that defeats the criteria of recognizing new contributors, right? They can win again in another award like Top PR of the Month, no issues on that.
As per original thread, based on consensus from those who voted, and the November PR thread, below were the numbers from first responses. Hence chose the majority number 10. 10 PRs - Wei, Jen 20 PRs - Pierre At the minimum, 1 PR submission is needed to qualify, hence put it here above, for clarity sake. New contributors would not be in the Top 100 for sure, from so far whatever I have observed so far. We can manually check if needed before voting and deciding results as well, if an exception happens in the future. We can check via script as well for this. However, I initiated this thread to finalise the criteria and not the implementation here. Sure - let us discuss more! The more inputs we have from everyone, the better it is, since this is FOR the community AND BY the community :) Let us hear other opinions that come in on this thread, before finalizing on the criteria for Rookie PRs before Friday! Warm Regards, Srabasti Banerjee *Kindly note : We recognised the need for different awards to recognise other contributors using different criterias in the future, as was discussed in the discussion thread mentioned above. This thread is only for the Rookie PRs.* On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 9:49 PM Wei Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > I don’t think the consensus was “at least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs > (<10).” My understanding was more like over 10, but it doesn't appear in > https://github.com/apache/airflow/graphs/contributors. (This might not > even be the consensus yet.) Our consensus was to proceed, but the details > may require further discussion. > > Best, > Wei > > > On Dec 9, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Amogh Desai <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Just checking something I am not to clear on - is it a one time award per > > person? > > (Keeping the criteria in mind) > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Amogh Desai > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:08 AM Srabasti Banerjee < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hello All, > >> > >> Following the discussion thread below, calling for a lazy consensus on > >> criteria to determine Rookie PR of each month: > >> Discussion: > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rz28lgots24pq54x67stdyyrq6848ptm > >> > >> Rookie PR of the Month will run for new first time contributors with at > >> least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10) successfully merged in the > same > >> month. > >> > >> The lazy consensus will end Friday, 12th of December, 6 pm PST. > >> No need to answer unless you do not agree with the consensus. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Srabasti Banerjee > >> > >
