The 10 I meant was the minimum required to qualify. The main reason is wanting to keep the newcomer for a bit longer. If this is too strict, 5 might also be a good choice.
Best, Wei > On Dec 9, 2025, at 2:37 PM, Srabasti Banerjee <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Yes the award should be one time award per person for the same Rookie > award. Else, the same person can win multiple times - that defeats the > criteria of recognizing new contributors, right? > They can win again in another award like Top PR of the Month, no issues on > that. > > As per original thread, based on consensus from those who voted, and the > November PR thread, below were the numbers from first responses. Hence > chose the majority number 10. > 10 PRs - Wei, Jen > 20 PRs - Pierre > > At the minimum, 1 PR submission is needed to qualify, hence put it here > above, for clarity sake. > New contributors would not be in the Top 100 for sure, from so far whatever > I have observed so far. We can manually check if needed before voting and > deciding results as well, if an exception happens in the future. We can > check via script as well for this. However, I initiated this thread to > finalise the criteria and not the implementation here. > > Sure - let us discuss more! The more inputs we have from everyone, the > better it is, since this is FOR the community AND BY the community :) > Let us hear other opinions that come in on this thread, before finalizing > on the criteria for Rookie PRs before Friday! > > Warm Regards, > Srabasti Banerjee > > *Kindly note : We recognised the need for different awards to recognise > other contributors using different criterias in the future, as was > discussed in the discussion thread mentioned above. This thread is only for > the Rookie PRs.* > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 9:49 PM Wei Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don’t think the consensus was “at least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs >> (<10).” My understanding was more like over 10, but it doesn't appear in >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/graphs/contributors. (This might not >> even be the consensus yet.) Our consensus was to proceed, but the details >> may require further discussion. >> >> Best, >> Wei >> >>> On Dec 9, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Amogh Desai <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Just checking something I am not to clear on - is it a one time award per >>> person? >>> (Keeping the criteria in mind) >>> >>> Thanks & Regards, >>> Amogh Desai >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:08 AM Srabasti Banerjee < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello All, >>>> >>>> Following the discussion thread below, calling for a lazy consensus on >>>> criteria to determine Rookie PR of each month: >>>> Discussion: >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rz28lgots24pq54x67stdyyrq6848ptm >>>> >>>> Rookie PR of the Month will run for new first time contributors with at >>>> least 1 PR (>=1) and less than 10 PRs (<10) successfully merged in the >> same >>>> month. >>>> >>>> The lazy consensus will end Friday, 12th of December, 6 pm PST. >>>> No need to answer unless you do not agree with the consensus. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Srabasti Banerjee >>>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
