The earlier discussion had concerns about making changes in 3.x and the expressed preference was major version change. Accordingly the vote is for major version change.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Amol Kekre <a...@datatorrent.com> wrote: > The earlier discussion had concerns about this vote and the need to brand > to 4.x right now. IMO they were not sufficiently addressed. > > Thks > Amol > > > E:a...@datatorrent.com | M: 510-449-2606 | Twitter: @*amolhkekre* > > www.datatorrent.com > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote: > > > The discussion already took place [1]. There are two options under vote > out > > of that discussion and for the first option there is a single -1. Use of > -1 > > during voting (and veto on PR) when not showing up during the preceding > > discussion is problematic. > > > > Thomas > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bd1db8a2d01e23b0c0ab98a785f6ee > > 9492a1ac9e52d422568a46e5f3@%3Cdev.apex.apache.org%3E > > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:58 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Votes are only valid on code modifications with a reason. [1] > > > > > > However it looks to me that there’s not consensus and which way forward > > is > > > best I would suggest cancelling the vote and having a discussion of the > > > benefit or not of making the change. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Justin > > > > > > 1. https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > >
