All -1 are technically void at this point as justification given are why
project may continue without modifications and not why the modification
must not be done. Whether we proceed with the vote or with the
discussion, arguments should be what are pros and cons of a code change,
not that the project may continue without them. The same should apply
not only to the current set of changes, but to all future discussions.
Thank you,
Vlad
On 8/23/17 06:54, Thomas Weise wrote:
The discussion already took place [1]. There are two options under vote out
of that discussion and for the first option there is a single -1. Use of -1
during voting (and veto on PR) when not showing up during the preceding
discussion is problematic.
Thomas
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bd1db8a2d01e23b0c0ab98a785f6ee
9492a1ac9e52d422568a46e5f3@%3Cdev.apex.apache.org%3E
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:58 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
Hi,
Votes are only valid on code modifications with a reason. [1]
However it looks to me that there’s not consensus and which way forward is
best I would suggest cancelling the vote and having a discussion of the
benefit or not of making the change.
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Thank you,
Vlad
