Thomas, My worry is that consequences of main-branch being 4.x have not been discussed in detail. How about we take that up on discussion thread. I can volunteer to put 4.x to vote post that discussion.
Thks, Amol E:a...@datatorrent.com | M: 510-449-2606 | Twitter: @*amolhkekre* www.datatorrent.com On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote: > The earlier discussion had concerns about making changes in 3.x and the > expressed preference was major version change. Accordingly the vote is for > major version change. > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Amol Kekre <a...@datatorrent.com> wrote: > > > The earlier discussion had concerns about this vote and the need to brand > > to 4.x right now. IMO they were not sufficiently addressed. > > > > Thks > > Amol > > > > > > E:a...@datatorrent.com | M: 510-449-2606 | Twitter: @*amolhkekre* > > > > www.datatorrent.com > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > The discussion already took place [1]. There are two options under vote > > out > > > of that discussion and for the first option there is a single -1. Use > of > > -1 > > > during voting (and veto on PR) when not showing up during the preceding > > > discussion is problematic. > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ > bd1db8a2d01e23b0c0ab98a785f6ee > > > 9492a1ac9e52d422568a46e5f3@%3Cdev.apex.apache.org%3E > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:58 AM, Justin Mclean < > jus...@classsoftware.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Votes are only valid on code modifications with a reason. [1] > > > > > > > > However it looks to me that there’s not consensus and which way > forward > > > is > > > > best I would suggest cancelling the vote and having a discussion of > the > > > > benefit or not of making the change. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Justin > > > > > > > > 1. https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > > > > >
