Indeed - @others, please chime in based on previous AsterixDB list
experiences? I can go either way on this, but was thinking it might be
nicer for our "normal users" to not be spammed with any implementation
discussions. (But we don't have a huge set of those yet, obviously -
but we do have some, and have segregated the conversations.)
On 4/22/15 12:49 AM, Till Westmann wrote:
I’m not completely sure that I want one. We currently have one and it has some
reasonable traffic and the discussions are at a user-level.
Also all developers are subscribed to the user-list, so developers are aware of
user problems but not necessarily the other way around.
I think that works pretty well, but maybe a single list would work better.
Thoughts from the other AsterixDB developers?
Thanks,
Till
On Apr 20, 2015, at 10:45 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
<[email protected]> wrote:
+1, absolutely as Ted said, mine is just a recommendation.
If you want the users@ list, decide as a community (so far,
seems like Mike and Till wanted one?) and we can ask for one.
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Dunning <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Date: Monday, April 20, 2015 at 11:04 AM
To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: users and dev lists
Most incubator projects don't come in with either a user community or high
traffic on the dev list. Thus the default recommendation for a single
list.
It is a bit up to you guys. You heard the suggestion from Chris. You
know
your own situation.
The question is what will grow your community most effectively.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote:
For our pre-ASF lists, we split them for the opposite reason - because
there was so much dev-related traffic and we didn't want to burden our
non-dev users with all of that noise. Thoughts on that?
On 4/19/15 5:03 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
My advice, based on past experience, is to not split the lists
initially upon Incubation. It splinters the community. If you need
to split it b/c there is so much user related traffic later, I would
do it then.
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Till Westmann <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, April 19, 2015 at 7:16 PM
To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: users and dev lists
Hi,
we currently have users and dev lists for AsterixDB (outside of the
ASF)
and we actually have users that are not developers on the users list.
At the ASF we currently don’t have a users-list and I’m wondering if
we
should leave it that way or if we should add a users lists to
(hopefully)
migrate our current users to.
Thoughts/Preferences?
Thanks,
Till
