Since this is just a procedural decision that has no impact outside the AsterixDB podling, I think that the PPMC members (mentors + initial committer) are those who get to decide.
And as this is probably not a highly contested issue, we could take this decision by lazy consensus [1], i.e. your proposal is accepted, if nobody objects within 72 hours. Cheers, Till [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > On Apr 24, 2015, at 08:09, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: > > Given the discussions, I'd like to propose now that we close in on a "two > lists - dev and user" - answer to this one. I realize there are tradeoffs, > but because we do have some users already who are decidedly non-developer > types - and more coming - I'd like to have a list "for them" that encourages > them to be on it (by its topics and volume). Is there a way we can/should > bring this to a vote/decision by those that get to decide? (This will be our > first case-study in a post-joining-incubation decision. :-)) > > Cheers, > Mike > >> On 4/24/15 5:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I’m not completely sure that I want one. We currently have one and it has >>> some reasonable traffic and the discussions are at a user-level. >>> Also all developers are subscribed to the user-list, so developers are >>> aware of user problems but not necessarily the other way around. >>> I think that works pretty well, but maybe a single list would work better. >>> >>> Thoughts from the other AsterixDB developers? >> What about automatically generated notifications, like Jira issues, >> commit messages, etc.? >> >> I wouldn't recommend to push those to a user list? >> >> Jochen >
