I could do it as well. (Does it just entail saying "this note may
indeed pass" to a queue of msgs - a queue we'd all be trying to watch?)
Cheers,
Mike
On 5/3/15 1:11 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
I agree with your feeling. If we decide to do it that way, I’m volunteering to
be another moderator.
Are there other volunteers?
On May 3, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:
My feeling is it doesn't hurt to have more moderators rather than fewer.
Judicious white-listing allows the amount of moderation traffic to be
driven to very low levels so the load on the moderators is very, very low.
The cost of losing a moderator without quite knowing it it higher, I think,
than the load on a number of moderators.
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote:
Well, the JIRA was not the right way to request this.
But before we do it the right way, we need a few moderators for the list.
I assume that the mentors are the moderators for the other lists.
Is that the way it should be or should other PPMC members moderate as well?
Thanks,
Till
On May 2, 2015, at 18:30, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote:
Here’s the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580
Cheers,
Till
On May 2, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote:
Ok, since nobody objected, I’ll ask for the users list.
Cheers,
Till
On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:16 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote:
Since this is just a procedural decision that has no impact outside
the AsterixDB podling, I think that the PPMC members (mentors + initial
committer) are those who get to decide.
And as this is probably not a highly contested issue, we could take
this decision by lazy consensus [1], i.e. your proposal is accepted, if
nobody objects within 72 hours.
Cheers,
Till
[1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
On Apr 24, 2015, at 08:09, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote:
Given the discussions, I'd like to propose now that we close in on a
"two lists - dev and user" - answer to this one. I realize there are
tradeoffs, but because we do have some users already who are decidedly
non-developer types - and more coming - I'd like to have a list "for them"
that encourages them to be on it (by its topics and volume). Is there a
way we can/should bring this to a vote/decision by those that get to
decide? (This will be our first case-study in a post-joining-incubation
decision. :-))
Cheers,
Mike
On 4/24/15 5:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]>
wrote:
I’m not completely sure that I want one. We currently have one and
it has some reasonable traffic and the discussions are at a user-level.
Also all developers are subscribed to the user-list, so developers
are aware of user problems but not necessarily the other way around.
I think that works pretty well, but maybe a single list would work
better.
Thoughts from the other AsterixDB developers?
What about automatically generated notifications, like Jira issues,
commit messages, etc.?
I wouldn't recommend to push those to a user list?
Jochen
