Ok, since nobody objected, I’ll ask for the users list. Cheers, Till
> On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:16 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since this is just a procedural decision that has no impact outside the > AsterixDB podling, I think that the PPMC members (mentors + initial > committer) are those who get to decide. > > And as this is probably not a highly contested issue, we could take this > decision by lazy consensus [1], i.e. your proposal is accepted, if nobody > objects within 72 hours. > > Cheers, > Till > > [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > >> On Apr 24, 2015, at 08:09, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Given the discussions, I'd like to propose now that we close in on a "two >> lists - dev and user" - answer to this one. I realize there are tradeoffs, >> but because we do have some users already who are decidedly non-developer >> types - and more coming - I'd like to have a list "for them" that encourages >> them to be on it (by its topics and volume). Is there a way we can/should >> bring this to a vote/decision by those that get to decide? (This will be >> our first case-study in a post-joining-incubation decision. :-)) >> >> Cheers, >> Mike >> >>> On 4/24/15 5:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I’m not completely sure that I want one. We currently have one and it has >>>> some reasonable traffic and the discussions are at a user-level. >>>> Also all developers are subscribed to the user-list, so developers are >>>> aware of user problems but not necessarily the other way around. >>>> I think that works pretty well, but maybe a single list would work better. >>>> >>>> Thoughts from the other AsterixDB developers? >>> What about automatically generated notifications, like Jira issues, >>> commit messages, etc.? >>> >>> I wouldn't recommend to push those to a user list? >>> >>> Jochen >>
