I agree with your feeling. If we decide to do it that way, I’m volunteering to be another moderator.
Are there other volunteers? > On May 3, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > > My feeling is it doesn't hurt to have more moderators rather than fewer. > Judicious white-listing allows the amount of moderation traffic to be > driven to very low levels so the load on the moderators is very, very low. > The cost of losing a moderator without quite knowing it it higher, I think, > than the load on a number of moderators. > > > > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, the JIRA was not the right way to request this. >> But before we do it the right way, we need a few moderators for the list. >> I assume that the mentors are the moderators for the other lists. >> Is that the way it should be or should other PPMC members moderate as well? >> >> Thanks, >> Till >> >>> On May 2, 2015, at 18:30, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Here’s the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580 >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Till >>> >>>> On May 2, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ok, since nobody objected, I’ll ask for the users list. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Till >>>> >>>>> On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:16 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Since this is just a procedural decision that has no impact outside >> the AsterixDB podling, I think that the PPMC members (mentors + initial >> committer) are those who get to decide. >>>>> >>>>> And as this is probably not a highly contested issue, we could take >> this decision by lazy consensus [1], i.e. your proposal is accepted, if >> nobody objects within 72 hours. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Till >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 08:09, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Given the discussions, I'd like to propose now that we close in on a >> "two lists - dev and user" - answer to this one. I realize there are >> tradeoffs, but because we do have some users already who are decidedly >> non-developer types - and more coming - I'd like to have a list "for them" >> that encourages them to be on it (by its topics and volume). Is there a >> way we can/should bring this to a vote/decision by those that get to >> decide? (This will be our first case-study in a post-joining-incubation >> decision. :-)) >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Mike >>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 4/24/15 5:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>>>> I’m not completely sure that I want one. We currently have one and >> it has some reasonable traffic and the discussions are at a user-level. >>>>>>>> Also all developers are subscribed to the user-list, so developers >> are aware of user problems but not necessarily the other way around. >>>>>>>> I think that works pretty well, but maybe a single list would work >> better. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thoughts from the other AsterixDB developers? >>>>>>> What about automatically generated notifications, like Jira issues, >>>>>>> commit messages, etc.? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wouldn't recommend to push those to a user list? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jochen >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>
