Ulrich Mayring wrote, On 10/02/2003 0.08:
I tend to agree. Sevak is not an indipendent App, but something that is very tied to our needs. It's an App, but conceptually it's a big "component" that we use.Paul Hammant wrote:Folks, This is as much an application in its own right as anything else.IMHO it should be where Phoenix is. It is an application, ok, but that is more out of technical necessity than anything else. Sevak is the most important feature of Phoenix after JMX. I don't know how anyone could think that a connection of the "server application world" to the "web application world" would be an "add-on" of some sort. It is a vital feature of any application server, that there is a connection to the servlet/webapp world.
I'd leave it where it is.
As long as we haven't come up with a more generic mechanism, we should be glad that Paul wrote this thing and that we can tell our bosses: "Yeah, Avalon is web-enabled, we can use it."
+1
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
