Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Stephen McConnell wrote, On 10/02/2003 12.00:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Ulrich Mayring wrote, On 10/02/2003 11.47:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I tend to agree. Sevak is not an indipendent App, but something
that is very tied to our needs. It's an App, but conceptually it's
a big "component" that we use.
I'd leave it where it is.
It currently is in jakarta-avalon-apps, which I think is not the
ideal place either. The Sevak classes should be a part of Phoenix,
the demo application could remain in jakarta-avalon-apps.
Isn't it usable by Merlin too?
Yep!
Ok, so it's more a component than an "app".
After the moves of non-core stuff that Paul is pursuing, avalon-apps
could become part of the "components" part of Avalon.
That's correct.
Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
