Stephen McConnell wrote:
Ask yourself: if the HTTPD 2.0 project wiped out the documentation of the 1.3 branch because "considered obsolete" what kind of image would that have given the foundation? it doesn't matter that 2.0 is soooooo much cooler than 1.3 and the documentation is way better and more professional. It does not matter for those who depened on 1.3 and have no reason to upgrade (or such an upgrade is too expensive for them to balance the banefits of 2.0)
This is called "respect for your peers once they disagree on what you say and they get hurt by your decisions".
And this is a very weak argument! Moving on ...
Thanks for such a great description of exactly what the problem with you is.
I outlined something that was problematic for me and you outlined what was good for you and you disregarded my concerns as a very weak argument.
This has to stop.
-- Stefano.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
