Hello, these are very good ideas and I also agree that a fee should be asked in order to be listed on the directory. +1 to that.
Best, Charles-H.Schulz. Erwin Tenhumberg a écrit : > I agree with Peter that first need to agree on the policy for > being listed. I also agree with Louis and Cor that a small fee > makes sense. > > > From my point of view for being listed a company has to ... > > ... provide a dedicated webpage that explains the services > for OpenOffice.org, e.g. OpenOffice.org must be explicitly > mentioned on the page. > > ... put one or more links back to the main OpenOffice.org site > on the company web pages, e.g. to make sure that people > are made aware of the larger community (e.g. a link to the > contributing page) > > ... pay/donate x dollars via PayPal (e.g. $100) for being listed, > i.e. the money helps to sustain the project and it's fair > from a community point of view (i.e. everybody contributes > something back) > > I agree with Peter that a frequently run script based check > regarding the existence / online status of the dedicated page > would be very useful in order to avoid "zombie entries". > > > Best regards, > Erwin > > > > Cor Nouws wrote: >> Hi Peter :-), *, >> >> Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: >> >>> also consider charging to be listed. The fee would be minimal and >>> would go to paying for sustaining the project. >> >> I think it is OK to ask a fee. After all, for busniness listed it is >> marketing. And they also can exist (partly) because OOo exists ... >> >> This of course alongside other actions to improve the list, what >> Peter is writing about. >> >> Regards, >> Cor >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
