https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I believe I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> wrote: > I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898 and > maven repositories and category x licenses. > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org> wrote: > > > For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved > > since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all > those > > will make the 1.29.0 release. > > > > > > -Rui > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <rube...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been > merged. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Ruben > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Rui, > > > > > > > > Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 < > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed, > > > > there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X. > That > > > > needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1]. > > > > > > > > I’m working on getting > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946 > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today. > > Please > > > > wait for that. > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 < > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big > > refactoring > > > > and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going > to > > > > happen. Don’t wait for it. > > > > > > > > I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29: > > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 < > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble) > > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 < > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo) > > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 < > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis) > > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 < > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele) > > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 < > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan > > > Xiong) > > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 < > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini) > > > > > > > > What’s the status on those? > > > > > > > > Julian > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 < > > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622> > > > > > > > > PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition > > the > > > > email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi community, > > > > > > > > > > To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the > JIRA > > > > list > > > > > [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains > > > > open/in > > > > > progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be > > merged. > > > > > Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to > > be > > > > > released. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by > > the > > > > end > > > > > of this week. > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if you have any questions. > > > > > > > > > > [1]: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Rui > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Francesco Gini
