Hi, Rui. CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it currently. Thanks for your work!
Best, ZheHu On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<francesco.g...@gmail.com> wrote： https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I believe I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything. On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> wrote: I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898 and maven repositories and category x licenses. On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org> wrote: For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all those will make the 1.29.0 release. -Rui On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <rube...@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been merged. Regards, Ruben On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: Rui, Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 < https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed, there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X. That needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1]. I’m working on getting https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today. Please wait for that. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 < https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big refactoring and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going to happen. Don’t wait for it. I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29: * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 < https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble) * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 < https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo) * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 < https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis) * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 < https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele) * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 < https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan Xiong) * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 < https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini) What’s the status on those? Julian [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 < https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition the email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’. On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org> wrote: Hi community, To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the JIRA list [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains open/in progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be merged. Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to be released. My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by the end of this week. Please let me know if you have any questions. [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0 -Rui -- Francesco Gini
