Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.

> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Zhe.
> 
> Hi Francesco,
> 
> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> 
> -Rui
> 
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <iluff...@163.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi, Rui.
>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it currently.
>> Thanks for your work!
>> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> ZheHu
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/18/2021 06:08,Francesco Gini<francesco.g...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I believe
>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything.
>> 
>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around CALCITE-4898 and
>> maven repositories and category x licenses.
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as resolved
>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all
>> those
>> will make the 1.29.0 release.
>> 
>> 
>> -Rui
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <rube...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
>> merged.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Ruben
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Rui,
>> 
>> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked fixed,
>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
>> That
>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
>> 
>> I’m working on getting
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today.
>> Please
>> wait for that.
>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
>> refactoring
>> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going
>> to
>> happen. Don’t wait for it.
>> 
>> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan
>> Xiong)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco Gini)
>> 
>> What’s the status on those?
>> 
>> Julian
>> 
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
>> 
>> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition
>> the
>> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi community,
>> 
>> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
>> JIRA
>> list
>> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains
>> open/in
>> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
>> merged.
>> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to
>> be
>> released.
>> 
>> 
>> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
>> the
>> end
>> of this week.
>> 
>> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>> 
>> [1]:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
>> 
>> 
>> -Rui
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Francesco Gini
>> 

Reply via email to