IIRC, EOF/Wonder allowed you to implement NSKeyValueCoding and the Utilities class would call valueForKey instead of looking up methods/fields via reflection. Something similar that would allow you to write/generate your own readProperty method might work for Cayenne.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 3:28 PM Maik Musall <m...@selbstdenker.ag> wrote: > > > > Am 25.09.2018 um 16:59 schrieb John Huss <johnth...@gmail.com>: > > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:50 AM Maik Musall <m...@selbstdenker.ag > <mailto:m...@selbstdenker.ag>> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >>> Am 25.09.2018 um 16:23 schrieb Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org > >: > >>> > >>>> "Should Cayenne by default work without prefixed accessors". > >>> > >>> > >>> So how about this... Unless someone else steps in by then, let me > >> brainstorm it with Nikita a couple of weeks from now and see if we can > do a > >> DI solution. It is not nearly as involved as it appears. > >> > >> I would be very happy about that! :) > >> > >> And once that's there, one way to implement a BeanAccessor alternative > >> could perhaps be one that is tailored towards field-based DataObjects, > >> accessing the fields directly without using reflection? If possible, > that > >> could present another noticable performance win. > >> > > > > FWIW, I would consider this a non-goal since it would bypass the getter > > method which may have custom logic (like returning a default value or > > something). > > I didn't mean this to become a standard way, but once the DI point is > there, > it's easy to rock your own implementation if you know it matches your use > case. > > Maik > >
