> Am 25.09.2018 um 16:23 schrieb Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org>: > >> "Should Cayenne by default work without prefixed accessors". > > > So how about this... Unless someone else steps in by then, let me brainstorm > it with Nikita a couple of weeks from now and see if we can do a DI solution. > It is not nearly as involved as it appears. I would be very happy about that! :) And once that's there, one way to implement a BeanAccessor alternative could perhaps be one that is tailored towards field-based DataObjects, accessing the fields directly without using reflection? If possible, that could present another noticable performance win. Maik
- Allowing property getters without a "get" prefix... Hugi Thordarson
- Re: Allowing property getters without a "get&quo... Michael Gentry
- Re: Allowing property getters without a "get... Hugi Thordarson
- Re: Allowing property getters without a "... Musall, Maik
- Re: Allowing property getters without a "... Maik Musall
- Re: Allowing property getters without a &... Andrus Adamchik
- Re: Allowing property getters withou... Hugi Thordarson
- Re: Allowing property getters wi... Andrus Adamchik
- Re: Allowing property getter... Hugi Thordarson
- Re: Allowing property getter... Andrus Adamchik
- Re: Allowing property getter... Maik Musall
- Re: Allowing property getter... John Huss
- Re: Allowing property getter... Maik Musall
- Re: Allowing property getter... David Feshbach
- Re: Allowing property getter... Hugi Thordarson
- Re: Allowing property getter... Maik Musall
- Re: Allowing property getter... Nikita Timofeev
- Re: Allowing property getter... Hugi Thordarson
- Re: Allowing property getter... Nikita Timofeev
- Re: Allowing property getter... Hugi Thordarson
- Re: Allowing property getter... Nikita Timofeev