Hi Hasan, I'll check the branch and help to refactoring!
Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:16 AM Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all > > Within this refactoring effort, I'll move the package > org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core.access > from module rdf to a new module. > I have some candidate names for the new module: > - dataset > - graph > - graph.management > - triplecollection.management > > Name suggestions and comments are welcome, if any. > > Note that the module rdf will be removed once it is completely refactored. > > Cheers > Hasan > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:34 AM Hasan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Reto >> >> Thanks for the information. >> I'll take a look this weekend. >> >> Hasan >> >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:29 PM Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Hasan >>> >>> I had troubles compiling this branch as the relativePath of the parent >>> was mostly not set. I think if we set it, the whole reactor can be built, >>> but it becomes harder to make partial releases. An approach is to have all >>> modules depend on the latests released version of the parent. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Reto >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 8:03 AM >>> To: [email protected]; Furkan KAMACI <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring >>> >>> Dear all >>> >>> I'd like to continue working on the refactoring with the help of Furkan >>> Kamaci. >>> @Furkan KAMACI <[email protected]>: could you please take a look >>> at the reunited branch and let's discuss how to proceed step by step to >>> make clerezza better. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Hasan >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi Hasan >>> > >>> > I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list. >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > Reto >>> > >>> > > -----Original Message----- >>> > > From: Hasan <[email protected]> >>> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM >>> > > To: [email protected] >>> > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring >>> > > >>> > > I don't have much time if you can bear with me.... >>> > > >>> > > I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master. >>> > > Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed. >>> > > Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry >>> Reto. >>> > > >>> > > Hasan >>> > > >>> > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Hi Hasan >>> > > > >>> > > > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm using >>> > > > now is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate you doing >>> it. >>> > > > >>> > > > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the >>> > > > rdf-commons repo)? >>> > > > >>> > > > Cheers, >>> > > > Reto >>> > > > >>> > > > > -----Original Message----- >>> > > > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:[email protected]] >>> > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM >>> > > > > To: [email protected] >>> > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Hi Reto >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > Hi Hasan >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the >>> > > > > > initial content to be added to that named graph. >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > ah yes, of course. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > thx >>> > > > > hasan >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Cheers, >>> > > > > > Reto >>> > > > > > > -----Original Message----- >>> > > > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:[email protected]] >>> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM >>> > > > > > > To: [email protected] >>> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Hi Reto >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Yes, that would be nice. >>> > > > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ? >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > hasan >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili >>> > > > > > > <[email protected]> >>> > > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > +1 >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Tommaso >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <[email protected]>: >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Hi Hasan, >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today. >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of >>> > > > > > > > > TcManager with DataSet could look like. I think it would >>> > > > > > > > > be nice for code like this >>> > > > > > to work: >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph(); >>> > > > > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for >>> > > > > > > > > add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o)); >>> > > > > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI(" >>> > > > http://example.org/g2";); >>> > > > > > > > > DataSet ds = new >>> DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g). >>> > > > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName, >>> > > > > > > > > g2).build(); >>> > > > > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ...."); >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented >>> clerezza. >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Cheers, >>> > > > > > > > > Reto >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > >>> >>
