Hi Reto, all. Sorry, I was sick the whole last week and did not check clerezza emails. OK. I will move access to dataset, namely to org.apache.clerezza.dataset. Regarding commons.rdf classes and interfaces, they are moved to org.apache.clerezza.api. Since clerezza is about rdf, I remove the rdf in the directory hierarchy.
cheers hasan On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:19 PM Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hasan > > I think org.apache.clerezza.rdf.dataset would be good, with TcManager > being replaced with Dataset and aligned to the definition in the SPARQL > spec. > > The basic RDF classes/interfaces (now in commons.rdf) I assume will be > directly in org.clerezza.rdf, is that correct? > > Cheers, > Reto > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 8:16 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Furkan KAMACI <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring > > Dear all > > Within this refactoring effort, I'll move the package > org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core.access > from module rdf to a new module. > I have some candidate names for the new module: > - dataset > - graph > - graph.management > - triplecollection.management > > Name suggestions and comments are welcome, if any. > > Note that the module rdf will be removed once it is completely refactored. > > Cheers > Hasan > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:34 AM Hasan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Reto > > > > Thanks for the information. > > I'll take a look this weekend. > > > > Hasan > > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:29 PM Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Hasan > >> > >> I had troubles compiling this branch as the relativePath of the > >> parent was mostly not set. I think if we set it, the whole reactor > >> can be built, but it becomes harder to make partial releases. An > >> approach is to have all modules depend on the latests released version > of the parent. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Reto > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 8:03 AM > >> To: [email protected]; Furkan KAMACI <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring > >> > >> Dear all > >> > >> I'd like to continue working on the refactoring with the help of > >> Furkan Kamaci. > >> @Furkan KAMACI <[email protected]>: could you please take a look > >> at the reunited branch and let's discuss how to proceed step by step > >> to make clerezza better. > >> > >> Cheers > >> Hasan > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Hasan > >> > > >> > I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list. > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Reto > >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > From: Hasan <[email protected]> > >> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM > >> > > To: [email protected] > >> > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring > >> > > > >> > > I don't have much time if you can bear with me.... > >> > > > >> > > I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master. > >> > > Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed. > >> > > Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry > Reto. > >> > > > >> > > Hasan > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi Hasan > >> > > > > >> > > > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm > >> > > > using now is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate > >> > > > you doing > >> it. > >> > > > > >> > > > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the > >> > > > rdf-commons repo)? > >> > > > > >> > > > Cheers, > >> > > > Reto > >> > > > > >> > > > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:[email protected]] > >> > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM > >> > > > > To: [email protected] > >> > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Hi Reto > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi Hasan > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the > >> > > > > > initial content to be added to that named graph. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > ah yes, of course. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > thx > >> > > > > hasan > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Cheers, > >> > > > > > Reto > >> > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:[email protected]] > >> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM > >> > > > > > > To: [email protected] > >> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Reto > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Yes, that would be nice. > >> > > > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ? > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > hasan > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili > >> > > > > > > <[email protected]> > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > +1 > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Tommaso > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <[email protected]>: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Hasan, > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of > >> > > > > > > > > TcManager with DataSet could look like. I think it > >> > > > > > > > > would be nice for code like this > >> > > > > > to work: > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph(); > >> > > > > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method > >> > > > > > > > > for add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o)); > >> > > > > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI(" > >> > > > http://example.org/g2"); > >> > > > > > > > > DataSet ds = new > >> DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g). > >> > > > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName, > >> > > > > > > > > g2).build(); > >> > > > > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ...."); > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented > >> clerezza. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Cheers, > >> > > > > > > > > Reto > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >
