Hi Furkan Have you tried to check the branch? If you have questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Maybe you can try to solve CLEREZZA-1036.
Cheers Hasan On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 5:56 PM Furkan KAMACI <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hasan, > > I'll check the branch and help to refactoring! > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:16 AM Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Dear all >> >> Within this refactoring effort, I'll move the package >> org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core.access >> from module rdf to a new module. >> I have some candidate names for the new module: >> - dataset >> - graph >> - graph.management >> - triplecollection.management >> >> Name suggestions and comments are welcome, if any. >> >> Note that the module rdf will be removed once it is completely refactored. >> >> Cheers >> Hasan >> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:34 AM Hasan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Reto >>> >>> Thanks for the information. >>> I'll take a look this weekend. >>> >>> Hasan >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:29 PM Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Hasan >>>> >>>> I had troubles compiling this branch as the relativePath of the parent >>>> was mostly not set. I think if we set it, the whole reactor can be built, >>>> but it becomes harder to make partial releases. An approach is to have all >>>> modules depend on the latests released version of the parent. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Reto >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 8:03 AM >>>> To: [email protected]; Furkan KAMACI <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring >>>> >>>> Dear all >>>> >>>> I'd like to continue working on the refactoring with the help of Furkan >>>> Kamaci. >>>> @Furkan KAMACI <[email protected]>: could you please take a look >>>> at the reunited branch and let's discuss how to proceed step by step to >>>> make clerezza better. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Hasan >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:29 PM Reto Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi Hasan >>>> > >>>> > I'm not sure how usefull this is, and if PDFs make it to the list. >>>> > >>>> > Cheers, >>>> > Reto >>>> > >>>> > > -----Original Message----- >>>> > > From: Hasan <[email protected]> >>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:02 AM >>>> > > To: [email protected] >>>> > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring >>>> > > >>>> > > I don't have much time if you can bear with me.... >>>> > > >>>> > > I would say yes, we'll use the reunited branch as the new master. >>>> > > Could you please send me the notes about the changes we discussed. >>>> > > Or perhaps a summary of it? I seem to not have it anymore. Sorry >>>> Reto. >>>> > > >>>> > > Hasan >>>> > > >>>> > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > > Hi Hasan >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Will you be performing the drafted changes? Vscode that I'm using >>>> > > > now is not so good at refactoring, so I would appreciate you >>>> doing it. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Do we take the reunited branch as new master (and drop the >>>> > > > rdf-commons repo)? >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Cheers, >>>> > > > Reto >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > -----Original Message----- >>>> > > > > From: Hasan Hasan [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:42 PM >>>> > > > > To: [email protected] >>>> > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > Hi Reto >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Reto Gmür <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > > Hi Hasan >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > The second argument would the graph to be added, or the >>>> > > > > > initial content to be added to that named graph. >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > ah yes, of course. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > thx >>>> > > > > hasan >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > Cheers, >>>> > > > > > Reto >>>> > > > > > > -----Original Message----- >>>> > > > > > > From: Hasan [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:25 PM >>>> > > > > > > To: [email protected] >>>> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Clerezza refactoring >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > Hi Reto >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > Yes, that would be nice. >>>> > > > > > > But why we need a second argument in addNamedGraph ? >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > hasan >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili >>>> > > > > > > <[email protected]> >>>> > > > > > > wrote: >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > +1 >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > Tommaso >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > 2018-01-27 18:03 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür <[email protected]>: >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > Hi Hasan, >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the good conversation today. >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > I was thinking on how the discussed replacement of >>>> > > > > > > > > TcManager with DataSet could look like. I think it >>>> would >>>> > > > > > > > > be nice for code like this >>>> > > > > > to work: >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > Graph g = new SimpleGraph(); >>>> > > > > > > > > g.addTriple(s, p, o); //new shortcut method for >>>> > > > > > > > > add(new TripleImpl(s,p,o)); >>>> > > > > > > > > BlankNodeOrIRI graphName = new IRI(" >>>> > > > http://example.org/g2";); >>>> > > > > > > > > DataSet ds = new >>>> DataSetBuilder().setDefaultGraph(g). >>>> > > > > > > > addNamedGraph(graphName, >>>> > > > > > > > > g2).build(); >>>> > > > > > > > > ResultSet rs = ds.querySelect("SELECT ...."); >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to a simplified and documented >>>> clerezza. >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > Cheers, >>>> > > > > > > > > Reto >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > >>>> >>>
