Nicola Ken Barozzi said: > Berin, I think that Robert has a valid point here, and that is > similar to what Avalon said about Logkit and Log4j. > > When I was still in Avalon, Avalon had informally agreed to push > Logkit EOL in favor of log4j, and the log4j community accepted > the challenge of bridging the last differences still remaining. > > Why is this point much different from the one Robert is talking > about?
Well, Robert's assertion is ambigious. Does he say; Drop void enableLogging( Logger logger ); and let every component do, logger = Logger.getLogger( this.getClass().getLogger() ); OR, "Let Log4J be the default logger backend, and have the Log4J configuration handily available." I think Berin is -1 on the first, but more receptible to the latter. Niclas
