Berin Loritsch said: > Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> Well, Robert's assertion is ambigious. Does he say; >> >> Drop >> void enableLogging( Logger logger ); >> >> and let every component do, >> >> logger = Logger.getLogger( this.getClass().getLogger() ); >> >> OR, >> >> "Let Log4J be the default logger backend, and have the Log4J >> configuration handily available." >> >> >> I think Berin is -1 on the first, but more receptible to the >> latter. > > I am very -1 for the first. > I am pretty +1 for the latter.
Then the question to the community would be; "Should Cocoon be configured out-of-the-box for logging to a Log4J backend?" I am in strong favour of this too, although I have no official say in it... Niclas
