There were some posts on February 4 that indicated that excalibur-instrument was a good way to get info on the pools was excalibur-instrument-manager (and presumably excalibur-instrument). Your earlier post indicated that avalon instrumentation is dead. Are these the same things?
Ralph -----Original Message----- From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 8:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Instrumentation, anyone? > > I'm no JMX expert at all, but I understand that basic JMX > support can be easily "piggybacked" on existing code, as long > as you're basically happy with monitoring and small > management tasks: more important needs might require > significant changes to the code base, so if I were to draw a > plan I would say that we _might_ include some JMX code right > now and that we _should_ plan JMX support for 2.2, even if > that requires some refactoring. I have the feeling that a > complex application like Cocoon really could use some > management tools. > Sounds like a good plan! Carsten
