Leszek Gawron wrote: > And if there are language constructs that are not possible to > implement with JXPath and JavaBeans? And I am sure there are > (I had some problems myself but shoot me in the head: I do > not remember the exact cases). Should we be saying to users: > "it does not work with JXPath, still it would with Jext, > since we dropped jexl officialy you have to plug it back in yourself"? > I suggest an "xpath based language" not JXPath :) Yes, I had some problems with JXPath as well, so I wouldn't use it but rather write an own implementation which isn't that difficult.
Carsten