Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Le 15 mars 06 à 16:04, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit : > >> ...I personally would love to have the new configuration features of >> 2.2 in >> 2.1.x, >> like the includes for xconf and properties. This alone is a big step >> forward. Unfortunately this is tight to many other changes like the >> Spring based container (which I also would like to have *today*). >> >> So perhaps your suggestion, starting anew with 2.1.x as trunk is a good >> way to move on... > > How about backporting the Spring-based container and the new > configuration features to 2.1.x, and make that Cocoon 2.3, without > touching the current trunk? > > The current 2.2 would then stay as is, people could work on it until it > stabilizes, and when it's time to release it we can always call it 3.0 > or whatever to avoid confusion. > > And that 2.3 release would be a big improvement already, especially > using Spring as its container.
Exactly the sort of thing I'm talking about. Both streams keep innovating. Regards, Upayavira
