On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 10:37 PM Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/1/15 8:35 PM, James Carman wrote: > > [x] -1 We should not do this because... > > > > For the record, I am also -1 to this code contribution, at least if done > in > > this way. I would be happy to have this go through the incubator and > build > > some community around it first so that we can make sure we dot all the > i's > > and cross all the t's with respect to IP clearance, etc. > > What exactly are those "i's and t's" that are not included in the > clearance template? > > I would rather it go through the official incubation process. If all of those steps have already been taken, then I'm sure it won't take long.
