Great! So, just to keep the ball rolling, if I don't hear anything by Tuesday night (2015-04-28), I shall merge in the latest https://github.com/apache/incubator-commonsrdf/pull/10 as proposed on Friday.
This would include renaming to `uniqueReference()` which I think strikes a good balance of non-IRI-ness and non-local-identifier-ness. I just added a section about blank node to the user guide which can be adapted either way: http://commonsrdf.incubator.apache.org/userguide.html#Blank_node On 24 April 2015 at 19:34, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote: > If COMMONSRDF-6 evolves towards a general agreement, we can wait some days > more for 0.1-incubating release. > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I would prefer to include the tidy-up text using "reference" as word >> and avoid the current implementation specifics, but leave the actual >> method renaming for later unless we get a quick agreement. >> >> >> >> On 23 April 2015 at 20:36, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Sorry, language issue, I actually wanted to say something like: >> > "when COMMONSRDF-6 will be resolved (...)" >> > >> > Either discuss a better naming and text or shift it for 0.2 are valid >> > options. But clearly it's an aspect that requires further discussion, and >> > last minute changes could not get the required consensus. So I would >> > personally prefer to keep it as it is for now, a resolve COMMONSRDF-6 in >> > the next release. >> > >> > What all the other people think? >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> On 23/04/15 16:21, Sergio Fernández wrote: >> >> >> >>> With COMMONSRDF-6 resolved we' d be ready to release. >> >>> >> >> >> >> Declaring COMMONSRDF-6 resolved at the last minute is what I think is a >> >> bad idea. >> >> >> >> The current text is using the word/concept of "identifier" in two >> >> different ways. The qualified text is reasonable (if you know the >> answer!) >> >> but I remain unconvinced that adjacent uses is helpful or the new split >> of >> >> class/factory text works (see suggestion on JIRA) ; I want to take time >> >> over reviewing changes and suggesting more but not to let that stop a >> >> release. >> >> >> >> Let's leave this open across the release with no more than our "best" >> >> approximation for now (AKA what happens to be in the codebase at the >> >> release point). >> >> >> >> Andy >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Sergio Fernández >> > Partner Technology Manager >> > Redlink GmbH >> > m: +43 6602747925 >> > e: [email protected] >> > w: http://redlink.co >> >> >> >> -- >> Stian Soiland-Reyes >> Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating) >> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 >> > > > > -- > Sergio Fernández > Partner Technology Manager > Redlink GmbH > m: +43 6602747925 > e: [email protected] > w: http://redlink.co -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
