As I've just commented on COMMONSRDF-6, I'm fine with the two changes Peter proposed. I think they do not change the essence behind the patch, but just make less strong some wording. So should be fine to update be PR with those minor changes before merging into master for starting to work on 0.1.0-incubating release.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> wrote: > at least some kind of *reference seems to be what we're settling on :) > > On 27 April 2015 at 16:27, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote: > > ups... > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sergio Fernández < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I'd prefer internalIdentifier(), but uniqueReference() should be also > fine > >> > > > > I actually wanted to say "I'd prefer internalReference(), but > > uniqueReference() should be also fine". > > > > Sorry for the (big) mistake. I guess this discussion is taking too long > > that I can get confused when thinking about solutions. > > > > -- > > Sergio Fernández > > Partner Technology Manager > > Redlink GmbH > > m: +43 6602747925 > > e: [email protected] > > w: http://redlink.co > > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating) > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 > -- Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 6602747925 e: [email protected] w: http://redlink.co
