Hi Stian, On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:16 AM, < [email protected]> wrote:
> > From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> > To: dev <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 13:15:48 +0100 > Subject: Re: Next Release for Commons RDF > +1 > > If we can settle on Quad (pull request 19) - then we can include that > as well which makes a nice release - otherwise let's just do a point > release with the smaller improvements. > I would be favorable to a point release 0.2? > > > The parser API branch need a bit more work to settle, so I would not > want to delay a release for that. > Agreed. > > > I can be RM unless you want to have a go, Lewis? > Is the process documented anywhere? If not then it would be good to capture it this time around. I have no objection to being a RM, however if you made the 0.1 release and are able to document how 0.2 should be done then I would prefer that. Thanks Lewis > > > On 15 April 2016 at 05:43, Lewis John Mcgibbney > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I've seen quite a bit of activity recently which is nice. > > Is there any appetite for a release? > > Thanks > > Lewis > > > > -- > > *Lewis* > > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating) > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 > > > -- *Lewis*
