I'm fine with the last changes in the API.

Whoever wants to take the role of RM for this 0.2-incubating release, just
go ahead.

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Stian,
>
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:16 AM, <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]>
> > To: dev <[email protected]>
> > Cc:
> > Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 13:15:48 +0100
> > Subject: Re: Next Release for Commons RDF
> > +1
> >
> > If we can settle on Quad (pull request 19)  - then we can include that
> > as well which makes a nice release - otherwise let's just do a point
> > release with the smaller  improvements.
> >
>
> I would be favorable to a point release 0.2?
>
>
> >
> >
> > The parser API branch need a bit more work to settle, so I would not
> > want to delay a release for that.
> >
>
> Agreed.
>
>
> >
> >
> > I can be RM unless you want to have a go, Lewis?
> >
>
> Is the process documented anywhere? If not then it would be good to capture
> it this time around. I have no objection to being a RM, however if you made
> the 0.1 release and are able to document how 0.2 should be done then I
> would prefer that.
> Thanks
> Lewis
>
>
> >
> >
> > On 15 April 2016 at 05:43, Lewis John Mcgibbney
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi Folks,
> > > I've seen quite a bit of activity recently which is nice.
> > > Is there any appetite for a release?
> > > Thanks
> > > Lewis
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Lewis*
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stian Soiland-Reyes
> > Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
> > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: [email protected]
w: http://redlink.co

Reply via email to